Recent developments at Manchester United have been striking, with Sir Jim Ratcliffe’s candid and forthright remarks surprising many observers.
In a series of interviews, Sir Jim Ratcliffe tackled various issues concerning Manchester United, addressing everything from previous errors to the legacy left by the Glazer family.
Notably, he disclosed that the club still has outstanding payments to the clubs from which they acquired players such as Antony, Casemiro, and Rasmus Hojlund, among others.
It is uncommon for an owner to specifically mention current players in discussions about those who may be considered “overpaid” or “not good enough.”
The response from Casemiro regarding Ratcliffe’s comments will now be exclusively revealed by United in Focus.
Casemiro on Sir Jim Ratcliffe’s comments
Casemiro joined the club as a last-minute acquisition during the final moments of the summer transfer window in 2022, following the failure to secure Erik ten Hag’s primary target, Frenkie de Jong.
The Brazilian enjoyed an outstanding first season, which alleviated concerns regarding the urgency of his signing; however, the risks associated with his acquisition became apparent in the subsequent season.
Having been signed for nearly £60 million, it was evident that Casemiro’s peak performance years were behind him, leading to a noticeable decline in his second season.
This situation is further complicated by Ratcliffe’s recent disclosure that the club is still financially responsible for his transfer, likely through amortization.
Transfer expert Graeme Bailey has reported to United in Focus that the midfielder has taken issue with Ratcliffe’s remarks, prompting the club to intensify efforts to facilitate his departure.
It becomes increasingly astonishing when Ratcliffe disclosed that United continues to finance his transfer, likely through amortization.
Transfer expert Graeme Bailey, in a discussion with United in Focus, has now indicated that the midfielder has been offended by Ratcliffe’s remarks, prompting the club to expedite efforts to facilitate his departure.
Bailey said: “United still working hard with the Pro League to try and get him out, they are in constant contact with them – they realise they are only place that can get him out and take his wages – if not they are looking at possible loans, which they are keen to avoid.
“We can also confirm that Casemiro is one of the players that have been left ‘shocked’ by Sir Jim Ratcliffe’s comments and has taken offence. This could complicate things. United would like the Brazilian to take a wage cut ahead of a possible move away but that looks unlikely now.”
Casemiro-Sir Jim Ratcliffe situation has been complicated
Ratcliffe’s remarks may come as a surprise; however, Casemiro has consistently been mentioned by him in discussions regarding poor business decisions. This is not the first instance in which Ratcliffe has directed criticism towards him. Nevertheless, it is important to acknowledge that the player entered into a contract that was mutually agreed upon.
In this context, a more diplomatic approach might have been beneficial, especially as the Brazilian appears resolute in fulfilling his contractual obligations. He is entirely justified in his stance, which corresponds with Ratcliffe’s assertion that rectifying previous errors at Old Trafford will require time.
It is conceivable that all parties involved could have navigated the situation in a manner that better served the interests of everyone concerned.
Leave a Reply